Service Animals, Emotional Support, and Guide Dogs9448578

来自joyousreading
185.31.160.226讨论2020年9月28日 (一) 23:46的版本 (创建页面,内容为“Sadly, some individuals are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by people who want to scam the system. There have been news stories,...”)
(差异) ←上一版本 | 最后版本 (差异) | 下一版本→ (差异)
跳转至: 导航搜索

Sadly, some individuals are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by people who want to scam the system.

There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces as well as other editorials where people rant and complain about people they believe to be abusing the system. You hear some complain they had to sit near a dog at a restaurant they don't believe can be a "real" service dog, or others complain that their neighbors use a pet in a "no pet" building because they claimed the animal is esa doctors.

A few of the commentary has an indignant tone, and a few people are downright angry.

How can this affect people who legitimately own and employ a service animal to raised their lives? In many ways.

For one, it can it more difficult to navigate bureaucracy on the planet when your claim of a disability as well as your service or emotional support animal's status is questioned. If a landlord or business proprietor has heard negative stories claiming that some people are abusing the machine, it can cause these phones look suspiciously whatsoever claimants.

Some landlord and business people have begun requesting proof of status, even though asking for written or other evidence is not always legal, and although many owners of legitimate service animals and emotional support animals never have taken advantage of registering them, and therefore have no such documentation to make.

It is the suspicious attitude and illegal demands of some landlords and business owners that make registrations services like the Service Animal Registry of California so important legitimate owners.

Although registration is optional, it can help shortcut the housing rental and business access issues once the owner can create a simple document that may often fulfill the owner or landlord. Also, when using public spaces, it's easier to give over a document with a simple sentence stating, "This can be a service animal" and letting the other party see the information, instead of having a long-winded protracted conversation (or worse yet, argument) in public places, with onlookers listening in and gathering around the discussion.

So, perform some people scam the device, or game regulations? Sadly, the reply is "probably yes." In everyday life, there is always room for abuse the ones can make an effort to take advantage of many systems that people as a society applied to protect the rights of those who need such protection. As an example, many drivers falsely display disabled parking placards to take advantage of free and convenient parking. Not forgetting the number of people that lie on their tax returns, claim improper tax deductions, abuse shop return policies, or do other bad acts.

However that percentage of abuse, which in the area of service animal laws is hopefully small, is arguably a very small investment when compared to the higher purpose of promoting access and equality for many.

In the end, you can't control any system to make it 100% abuse proof. So tolerating the not enough people who scam service animal laws will be the price we gladly pay to ensure that the disabled inside the great condition of California have equal access under law.